Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Censure

The Republicans are lawbreakers, but the Democrats are idiots. Not backing Feingold's censure resolution, pretty much the only thing we can do at this point to hold the president accountable for his potentially lawbreaking actions, is a completely political move that will completely backfire.

Democrats have become so accustomed to attacks at the hands of Fox News, Newscorp, and the rest of the right-wing media that they have become afraid to do anything politically.

OF COURSE the censure resolution will make waves. That's the point!!! The Republican majority congress is too afraid to investigate this program, so they've chosen not to. Without pushing this program into the spotlight time and again, this program will NEVER be investigated, just as prewar intelligence, and the potential fabrication involved in the buildup to war, has NEVER been investigated 3 years after the fact.

If elected democrats aren't willing to question this president's actions and do whatever's necessary to check his power, then we'll elect people who will. And if we can't, we'll become disillusioned and you will lose to a republican.

Fuck if I care if democrats, who only care about political ramifications and not constitutionally mandated oversight, lose to republicans. The republicans are doing what's expected of them; the democrats are not.

It's fucking pathetic.

6 Comments:

Blogger James Young said...

Willis, you wouldn't recognize the Constitution if someone dragged you down to the National Archives and planted your pasty white face on the glass underneath which it is displayed.

What should happen is that Feingold should be expelled for his effort to destroy First Amendment rights via campaign finance so-called reform

9:39 PM  
Blogger Willis said...

Nobody said censure was mentioned in the constitution, fudgy. Your argument is a non sequitor.

12:46 AM  
Blogger James Young said...

Willis, that you don't recognize the constitutional implications of your nonsensical endorsement of Feingold's nonsensical proposal simply proves my point.

But it does confirm your status as a fine example of the benefits of government education by NEA members.

11:25 AM  
Blogger Willis said...

Fudgepack,

Explain how my endorsement of censure has constitutional ramifications.

Or are you just pulling shit out your ass again??

2:13 PM  
Blogger James Young said...

Willis, I'm not sure who you're addressing. YOU'RE apparently the fudgepacker (or more probably, a fudgepackee), so I fail to understand your form of address. Offended by the reality of the behavior that you endorse and/or engage in?

As for "explain," I'm not in the mood to cast pearls before a swine. It's much more exciting to see you making an idiot of yourself.

4:30 PM  
Blogger Willis said...

Ah, so you won't even defend your argument?? That's as close to an admission of defeat as we'll ever get from fudgepack.

4:35 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home